The Collingridge
dilemma is about unpredictability. It is about the fact that you cannot predict
the future. This sounds rather pathetic for such a nice name. I mean, isn’t it
obvious?
However, it
is about unpredictability in the very narrow context of technology assessment
or better the social control of technology. Nevertheless, we struggle hard to
avoid future analogues of the atomic bomb.
Instead of
sitting still, doing nothing but sitting, we carry on to do research to become
faster than our problems, our destiny, faster than light: and this in the face
of the Collingridge dilemma.
An old
Austrian song about the new wave of motorcycling in the 1950ies states: “I don’t
know where I am going to, but I’ll be the first one there.” That is the power of
technoscientific innovation. And the scientists themselves are the best
motorcyclists by adding: “We are just curious”.
In the
Collingridge dilemma of everyday life we have our experiences and base our
assumptions on them. Maybe that is the reason why we survive. The problem is
that no two moments in time are the same, and so are the places.
We keep on
struggling against this constant change and so we suffer.
Back to
technology assessment: After two days at a TA conference in Vienna I am sure
that we need some time to catch up with what already exists, instead of pushing
the frontier further. But maybe we can never achieve this.
In a world
without technology, the Collingridge dilemma is gone. But will we still be
there?
No comments:
Post a Comment